-
The Supreme Court of India in Rajiv Thapar & Ors vs Madan Lal Kapoor 2013 (3) SCC 330 observed as under- “21. The High Court, in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., must make a just and rightful choice. This is not a stage of evaluating the truthfulness or otherwise of…
-
The Supreme Court in Urmila Dixit v. Sunil Sharan Dixit and Ors. upheld that Maintenance Tribunals can cancel conditional gifts and order eviction if children fail to maintain elderly parents. It affirmed a liberal, welfare-oriented interpretation of Section 23, ensuring senior citizens receive effective remedies against neglect and misuse of transferred property. 1. Facts in…
-
This landmark Supreme Court judgment reinforces the welfare-centric intent of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. It affirms that tribunals can order eviction of children or relatives who fail to maintain senior citizens, ensuring their dignity, protection, and peaceful enjoyment of property against neglect or exploitation. 1. Facts in Brief…
-
In Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand (2010) 7 SCC 667, the Supreme Court observed- “30. It is a matter of common experience that most of these complaints under section 498-A IPC are filed in the heat of the moment over trivial issues without proper deliberations. We come across a large number of such complaints…
-
Justice Krishna Iyer in Supreme Court’s judgment in Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi, (1979) 4 SCC 365 made a scathing observation- “An explosive escalation of automobile accidents, accounting for more deaths than the most deadly diseases, has become a lethal phenomenon on Indian Roads everywhere. The jural impact of this tragic…
-
Suo motu cognizance was taken by the Supreme Court on stray dogs menace primarily due to a series of alarming media reports and public outcry about increasing incidents of dog bites, child fatalities, and public health risks across urban areas – especially in Delhi-NCR.. 1. Facts behind suo motu cognizance by Court The case stems…
-
Supreme Court of India in M.S. Patter vs. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors., SLP(C) 878 of 2004 issued following directions on 12th September 2025 to all States and Union Territories in order to ensure humane conditions and dignity of life inside Beggars’ Homes and analogous institutions- “23. At the same time, we are…
Search the website
Popular Posts
- Supreme Court on Fraud and Deceit – Judgments
- Maintenance of Parents – Section 125 CrPC – Judgments
- Difference between Sec 125 CrPC and Senior Citizens Act
- Who is a Settlor in a Trust? – Role & Significance
- Supreme Court on Delay in lodging FIR / Complaint
- Plastic Ban – Constitutional Obligation
- Ex parte Injunction – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Senior Citizens Act – Maintenance & Welfare of Parents
- Maintenance Tribunals (Delhi) – Senior Citizens Act
- SC on Unreasonable Delay in Pronouncement of Judgment
- Supreme Court on Concealment of Material Facts
- What is a Will? – Essentials of a Valid Will
- Registration of FIR – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Appeal against Eviction Order – Senior Citizens Act
- What is Doctrine of Merger?
- Abbreviations used in Courts
- Daughter-in-Law’s Right To Reside – Senior Citizens Act
- Supreme Court on Honourable Acquittal in Criminal Cases
- SC on Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta
- Object and Purpose of Lodging FIR – Section 154 CrPC
- SC issues 12 Directions for Speedy Trial of Civil Cases
- Supreme Court on Principles Regarding the Plea of Alibi
- Grant of Bail – Supreme Court Guidelines
Law Quotes
Latest Posts
- SC on 4-Steps to Quash FIR: Section 482 CrPC
- Supreme Court on Maintenance Tribunals – Senior Citizens Act – Judgment
- Supreme Court on Eviction of Children from Parent’s/ Senior Citizen’s Property
- 498A – Advocates Have Social Responsibility: Supreme Court
- Justice Krishna Iyer on Road Accident Claims – MACT Cases
- Supreme Court on Stray Dogs Menace – Judgment
- Beggars’ Homes – Supreme Court Directions
- Misuse of Adjournments: Supreme Court Judgments
- Scope of Section 151 CPC: Supreme Court Judgments
- Presumption of Innocence is a Human Right
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The National Green Tribunal Act, 2009
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
- Role and Duties of an Advocate: Supreme Court Judgments
- Justice Felix Frankfurter – Quotes
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018