-
1. Advocate stands in Loco Parentis to Client In Pandurang Dattatraya Khandekar vs Bar Council of Maharashtra [(1984) 2 SCC 556 : 1984 SCC (Cri) 335], the Supreme Court observed: “9. … An advocate stands in a loco parentis towards the litigants and it therefore follows that the client is entitled to receive disinterested, sincere…
-
“I know of no title that I deem more honorable than that of Professor of the Harvard Law School.”~ Justice Felix Frankfurter “There can be no security where there is fear.”~ Justice Felix Frankfurter “Without a free press there can be no free society. That is axiomatic. However, freedom of the press is not an…
-
Introduced in Parliament as The Specific Relief (Amendment) Bill, 2017, the said Bill was passed by both houses of Parliament and eventually became an Act, The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018. The Bill enumerated Objects and Reasons why the need was felt for necessary amendments in The Specific Relief Act, 1963. STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND…
-
Supreme Court Judgment on Order VII Rule 11 and Order X CPC when no cause of action is there or when the plaint is manifestly vexatious, and meritless. Landmark SC Judgment by Justice Krishna Iyer. SUPREME COURT OF INDIAT. Arivandandam vs T. V. Satyapal & Another on 14 October, 1977PETITIONER:T. ARIVANDANDAM Vs.RESPONDENT:T. V. SATYAPAL &…
-
“Laws, taken in their broadest meaning, are the necessary relations deriving from the nature of things; and in this sense, all beings have their laws: the divinity has its laws, the material world has its laws, then intelligences superior to man have their laws, the beasts have their laws, man has hislaws.” (Montesquieu 1989, 1.1)…
-
INTRODUCTION A mature legal system endeavours to provide not merely a remedy for every right infringed, but also an adequate remedy. It was in this process of a search for effective remedial action that Specific Relief emanated from the Equity Courts in England. The principles built up by successive Chancellors of England in this branch…
-
INTRODUCTION The first enactment of the kind was Lord Brougham’s Act (13 and 14 Vict., c. 21). The provisions of that statute were adopted to India, and somewhat simplified, by General Clauses Act (1 of 1868), and the General Clauses Act, 1887 (1 of 1887) was a further extension of the same principle. It was…
Search the website
Popular Posts
- Supreme Court on Fraud and Deceit – Judgments
- Maintenance of Parents – Section 125 CrPC – Judgments
- Difference between Sec 125 CrPC and Senior Citizens Act
- Who is a Settlor in a Trust? – Role & Significance
- Supreme Court on Delay in lodging FIR / Complaint
- Plastic Ban – Constitutional Obligation
- Ex parte Injunction – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Senior Citizens Act – Maintenance & Welfare of Parents
- Maintenance Tribunals (Delhi) – Senior Citizens Act
- SC on Unreasonable Delay in Pronouncement of Judgment
- Supreme Court on Concealment of Material Facts
- What is a Will? – Essentials of a Valid Will
- Registration of FIR – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Appeal against Eviction Order – Senior Citizens Act
- What is Doctrine of Merger?
- Abbreviations used in Courts
- Daughter-in-Law’s Right To Reside – Senior Citizens Act
- Supreme Court on Honourable Acquittal in Criminal Cases
- SC on Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta
- Object and Purpose of Lodging FIR – Section 154 CrPC
- SC issues 12 Directions for Speedy Trial of Civil Cases
- Supreme Court on Principles Regarding the Plea of Alibi
- Grant of Bail – Supreme Court Guidelines
Law Quotes
Latest Posts
- Rule of Law – A.V. Dicey
- SARFAESI Act – Statement of Objects & Reasons
- SC on 4-Steps to Quash FIR: Section 482 CrPC
- Supreme Court on Maintenance Tribunals – Senior Citizens Act – Judgment
- Supreme Court on Eviction of Children from Parent’s/ Senior Citizen’s Property
- 498A – Advocates Have Social Responsibility: Supreme Court
- Justice Krishna Iyer on Road Accident Claims – MACT Cases
- Supreme Court on Stray Dogs Menace – Judgment
- Beggars’ Homes – Supreme Court Directions
- Misuse of Adjournments: Supreme Court Judgments
- Scope of Section 151 CPC: Supreme Court Judgments
- Presumption of Innocence is a Human Right
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The National Green Tribunal Act, 2009
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
- Role and Duties of an Advocate: Supreme Court Judgments