-
5. The High Court, in our view, fell into patent error. The short question before the High Court was whether in the facts and circumstances of this case, Jagannath obtained the preliminary decree by playing fraud on the court. The High Court, however, went haywire and made observations which are wholly perverse. We do not…
-
The juristic justification of the doctrine of merger may be sought in the principle that there cannot be, at one and the same time. more than one operative order governing the same subject-matter. Therefore the judgment of an inferior court, if subjected to an examination by the superior court, ceases to have existence in the…
-
11. Secondly, the High Court ought to have seen that when a remedy of appeal under Section 104(1)(i) read with Order 43, Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was directly available, Respondents 1 and 2 ought to have taken recourse to the same. It is true that the availability of a remedy…
-
A predisposition to decide for or against one party, without proper regard to the true merits of the dispute is bias. There must be reasonable apprehension of that predisposition. The reasonable apprehension must be based on cogent materials. Supreme CourtSecretary to the Govt, Transport Deptt Madras vs Munuswamy Mudaliar & Ors 1988 AIR 2232 Bias…
-
“Legal malice” or “malice in law” means ‘something done without lawful excuse’. In other words, ‘it is an act done wrongfully and wilfully without reasonable or probable cause, and not necessarily an act done from ill feeling and spite’. It is a deliberate act in disregard of the rights of others’. [See Words and Phrases…
-
Mala fides means want of good faith, personal bias, grudge, oblique or improper motive or ulterior purpose. The administrative action must be said to be done in good faith, if it is in fact done honestly, whether it is done negligently or not. An act done honestly is deemed to have been done in good…
-
Courts across the legal system – this Court not being an exception – are choked with litigation. Frivolous and groundless filings constitute a serious menace to the administration of justice. They consume time and clog the infrastructure. Productive resources which should be deployed in the handling of genuine causes are dissipated in attending to cases…
Popular Posts
- Supreme Court on Fraud and Deceit – Judgments
- Maintenance of Parents – Section 125 CrPC – Judgments
- Difference between Sec 125 CrPC and Senior Citizens Act
- Who is a Settlor in a Trust? – Role & Significance
- Supreme Court on Delay in lodging FIR / Complaint
- Plastic Ban – Constitutional Obligation
- Ex parte Injunction – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Senior Citizens Act – Maintenance & Welfare of Parents
- Maintenance Tribunals (Delhi) – Senior Citizens Act
- SC on Unreasonable Delay in Pronouncement of Judgment
- Supreme Court on Concealment of Material Facts
- What is a Will? – Essentials of a Valid Will
- Registration of FIR – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Appeal against Eviction Order – Senior Citizens Act
- What is Doctrine of Merger?
- Abbreviations used in Courts
- Daughter-in-Law’s Right To Reside – Senior Citizens Act
- Supreme Court on Honourable Acquittal in Criminal Cases
- SC on Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta
- Object and Purpose of Lodging FIR – Section 154 CrPC
- SC issues 12 Directions for Speedy Trial of Civil Cases
- Supreme Court on Principles Regarding the Plea of Alibi
- Grant of Bail – Supreme Court Guidelines
Search the website
Law Quotes
Latest Posts
- Supreme Court on Misuse of Adjournments
- Scope of Section 151 CPC: Supreme Court Judgments
- Presumption of Innocence is a Human Right
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The National Green Tribunal Act, 2009
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
- Role and Duties of an Advocate: Supreme Court Judgments
- Justice Felix Frankfurter – Quotes
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018
- When No Cause of Action: SC Judgment (Justice Krishna Iyer)
- Montesquieu – Quotes
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The General Clauses Act, 1897
- Justice Earl Warren – Quotes
- Purpose of Directive Principles: Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Trade Marks Act, 1999